bfd/elf/mn10300 "dangerous error"

[DJ Delorie]

> The notion of what dangerous means is target dependent.  Some
> dangerous relocs should only be warnings.  Some should be fatal
> errors.  I don't know which is the case for elf-m10300.c.

Yeah, I was hoping someone would know the history.  The relocs in
question are non-pic relocs in a shared library, seemed kinda fatal to
me.

Is there any historical precedent for having a linker (or emulation)
option to control how fatal those cases should be?