.eh_frame section on alpha
Jakub Jelinek
jakub@redhat.com
Tue Jan 4 09:58:00 GMT 2005
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:43:25AM +0000, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> >>However, I also think it would be a good idea to have an assembler
> >>option to not create the unwind information.
>
> >Strongly agreed :-) I can come up with a patch, but I'm not sure what a
> >good option name would be. --no-auto-eh-frame seems a little unwieldy.
>
> How about: --no-create-eh-frame ?
>
> I see no problem with long switch names. It is better that they are
> expressive and tell the user what they are doing. Shorter, more compact
> switch names are often confusing and can lead to user misunderstanding.
Can't this be done already without adding new options with a
/DISCARD/ : { *(.eh_frame) }
in the linker script?
Jakub
More information about the Binutils
mailing list