binutils bug data base?

[Christopher Faylor]

On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:44:19PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>Al Stone <ahs3@fc.hp.com> writes:
>>>I am fairly certain it does not.
>>
>>Um, stupid question, then: shouldn't it?
>
>Yes, it probably should.
>
>But it doesn't.
>
>A sufficiently motivated person could probably borrow the gcc GNATS
>setup.

Actually, these days, it's the GCC bugzilla setup and if someone were
to ask nicely, it's entirely possible that Dan Berlin would set up a
bugzilla database for binutils.

>A bug database isn't much good by itself, since it requires people to
>actually take the time to look at the database and assign bugs to
>people and those people have to fix them.  But it's at least
>conceivable that setting up a bug database would lower the activation
>energy enough that this would come to pass.

Yep.

cgf