elfxx-ia64.c question

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Wed Jan 29 07:55:00 GMT 2003


On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 01:15:35PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> I was thinking of the case where a SECREL32 reloc is used against an
> undefined weak sym, and the base address of the section in question
> is located above 1<<32.  Under those circumstances you'll get a
> reloc overflow.  Same goes for dynamic syms (if such are allowed in
> SECREL relocs).

Maybe.  But the only place that really uses this is debug info...


r~



More information about the Binutils mailing list