mips elf n32 and 64 linker emulparams refactoring

[Thiemo Seufer]

Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2002, Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> wrote:
> 
> >> +LIB_PATH=/usr/lib32
> 
> > How will this work in a cross-compile environment?
> 
> It won't.  Typically, the compiler overrides these anyway.

Oh, ok, so this is a missing feature in GLD in general.

> This is
> just meant to overrides the /usr/lib used by default, when the linker
> is invoked directly.

Please note that /lib32:/usr/lib32 is better to find e.g. libc.
(IRIX has symlinks, but other systems probably not).

> >> +. ${srcdir}/emulparams/elf32bmipn32-defs.sh
> 
> > Sidemark: Especially in this context elf32bmipn32-defs.sh is a
> > really weird name.
> 
> Agreed, but note that this was just moved from both of the elf64*.sh
> files.
> 
> >> +ELFSIZE=64
> >> +LIB_PATH=/usr/lib64
> 
> > Same cross-compile problem here. Formerly it was only set for IRIX,
> > now a cross-ld on e.g. i386-linux will look in the wrong place.
> 
> Formerly a cross from i386-linux-gnu to mips-sgi-irix6 would have the
> same problem.  If it wasn't a problem for irix, why would it be a
> problem for mips-linux-gnu?

GLD was/is not regularily in use on IRIX, so I guess cross compilation
therre was only little used if at all.

> Yeah, I agree it's not ideal, but I think it's an improvement over
> what was there.  The only negative effect of this change is that a
> cross compiler may now look for libraries in a location where it won't
> find libraries for the target system.  It will do so after searching
> any directories listed in the command line, so it would have failed
> one way or the other.

Then at least the path should be disabled for cross builds (as in
e.g. elf64ppc.sh) to reduce confusion.


Thiemo