Patch to implement rotates by zero

Maciej W. Rozycki macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl
Tue Aug 20 10:23:00 GMT 2002


On 20 Aug 2002, Eric Christopher wrote:

> >  Well, the behaviour is defined explicitly for "sll" and "sllv" by "MIPS
> > R4000 Microprocessor User's Manual" (pp. A-140, A-141), the original spec
> > for the original MIPS III processor, so the assumption should be any MIPS
> > III+ implementation must do them this way; otherwise it is non-compliant
> > (or simply broken).  There is a note on broken code generated by some
> > assemblers there, though.  The book is available from www.mips.com. 
> 
> That's a pretty big assumption though :) I think I like it the other
> way.

 Why should we "punish" good implementations?  If there are any bad ones,
they can be handled with CPU-specific workarounds. 

-- 
+  Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland   +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+        e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available        +



More information about the Binutils mailing list