binutils patches for Cirrus/arm9e/maverick support

[Jonathan Larmour]

Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> 
> > I'd go for maverick (in the same way as xscale or strongarm); but I'd
> > prefer to see something in the config files that noted that this was
> 
> ok, one last go.  is it going to be maverick or arm9maverick?
> 
> just let me know what it is so i can code it.

It can't be just "maverick" because maverick is no one chip.

Jifl
-- 
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine