binutils patches for Cirrus/arm9e/maverick support

[philb@gnu.org]

In message < m3wv246b8t.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com >, Nick Clifton
 writes:
>Anyway Maverick is a much better name, so I suggest that other than
>for backwrds compatibility, we use "Maverick" instead of "arm9e" in the
>future.  Agreed ?

Good plan.  Not only is "Maverick" far cooler-sounding than "arm9e", it 
seems less likely to be confused with ARM's own ARM9E product family.

p.