[PATCH RFA] bfd/configure.in, bfd/configure

Ian Lance Taylor ian@zembu.com
Thu Feb 17 10:18:00 GMT 2000

   Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 03:42:04 -0700
   From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>

   Right you are.  I fixed it in my tree.  Here's a revised patch:

   Index: configure.in
   RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/configure.in,v
   retrieving revision 1.12
   diff -u -p -r1.12 configure.in
   --- configure.in	2000/01/10 18:50:16	1.12
   +++ configure.in	2000/02/17 10:40:29
   @@ -260,6 +260,12 @@ changequote([,])dnl
      rs6000-*-lynx*)	COREFILE=lynx-core.lo ;;
   +  rs6000-*-aix4.[3-9]* | powerpc-*-aix4.[3-9]*)
   +        COREFILE=rs6000-core.lo
   +	;;
      rs6000-*-aix4*)	COREFILE=rs6000-core.lo ;;
      rs6000-*-*)		COREFILE=rs6000-core.lo ;;
      powerpc-*-*bsd*)	COREFILE=netbsd-core.lo ;;

This is OK.

Consider: is there any preprocessor macro defined on AIX that you can
check for this, rather than relying on a configuration name match?
The file rs6000-core.c is only compiled on an AIX target, so it is OK
to check for AIX specific preprocessor macros, if there are any.

What should happen for aix5?


More information about the Binutils mailing list