What is this bogus change?

[Timothy Wall]

Yeah, I meant if it was not 4.  I've fixed listing.c.

T.

"H . J . Lu" wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 02:15:38PM -0500, Timothy Wall wrote:
> > This was only supposed to have an effect if LISTING_WORD_SIZE was not "1" AND
> > the target was little-endian (Only m68k and tic54x set LISTING_WORD_SIZE to
> > something other than "1").  If that is not the case, I'm not sure what
> > happened.  My bad.
>
> Did you mean LISTING_WORD_SIZE was not 4? If it is true, why not
> check it with "#if" instead of applying it blindly to targets where
> LISTING_WORD_SIZE == 4?
>
> >
> > A "byte" on the tic54x is two octets, so each two sequential octets need to be
> > printed in the correct order.
> >
> > Go ahead and revert the code; I'll fix the tic54x version later.
>
> I don't have the write access. Please apply it for me.
>
> Thanks.
>
> H.J.