What is this bogus change?

H . J . Lu hjl@valinux.com
Fri Feb 4 11:37:00 GMT 2000

On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 02:15:38PM -0500, Timothy Wall wrote:
> This was only supposed to have an effect if LISTING_WORD_SIZE was not "1" AND
> the target was little-endian (Only m68k and tic54x set LISTING_WORD_SIZE to
> something other than "1").  If that is not the case, I'm not sure what
> happened.  My bad.

Did you mean LISTING_WORD_SIZE was not 4? If it is true, why not
check it with "#if" instead of applying it blindly to targets where

> A "byte" on the tic54x is two octets, so each two sequential octets need to be
> printed in the correct order.
> Go ahead and revert the code; I'll fix the tic54x version later.

I don't have the write access. Please apply it for me.



More information about the Binutils mailing list