What is this bogus change?
H . J . Lu
Fri Feb 4 11:37:00 GMT 2000
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 02:15:38PM -0500, Timothy Wall wrote:
> This was only supposed to have an effect if LISTING_WORD_SIZE was not "1" AND
> the target was little-endian (Only m68k and tic54x set LISTING_WORD_SIZE to
> something other than "1"). If that is not the case, I'm not sure what
> happened. My bad.
Did you mean LISTING_WORD_SIZE was not 4? If it is true, why not
check it with "#if" instead of applying it blindly to targets where
LISTING_WORD_SIZE == 4?
> A "byte" on the tic54x is two octets, so each two sequential octets need to be
> printed in the correct order.
> Go ahead and revert the code; I'll fix the tic54x version later.
I don't have the write access. Please apply it for me.
More information about the Binutils