libiberty includes

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 200012271947.OAA03974@envy.delorie.com >you write:
  > 
  > > In a related vein: is there a reason that libiberty isn't released
  > > as a standalone package, seeing as how it is depended upon by so
  > > many different packages?
  > 
  > No, aside from "nobody has bothered".  I'd rather see effort put into
  > a "libiberty manual" that details the specs a libiberty-using
  > application can count on.
True.


  > Plus, making one more cvs repository means one more set of merges :-(
Err, we don't have to put it in its own CVS repo to make releases for it.
Just look at the binutils/gdb repository.

jeff