libiberty includes
Jeffrey A Law
law@redhat.com
Wed Dec 27 12:10:00 GMT 2000
In message < 20001227024211.A43768@dragon.nuxi.com >you write:
> Would it be acceptable to copy the libiberty includes into its own
> directory, or into the libiberty directory itself? With them currently
> in the shared binutils include dir, it is hard to do things with just the
> binutils includes.
I'd prefer not to.
> For instance, when Cygnus updates their internal tree, I assume they
> import libiberty bits from egcs/{include,libiberty}, and other .h files
> from binutils' src/include/.
Yes.
> But doesn't that end up being a PITA as the
> CVS tags w/in the internal include/ dir aren't consistent (ie, all files
> have the same tags), etc..
A little bit, not because of the tags, but because sometimes things are
checked into one repo, but not the other. A single repo would (of course)
fix that problem.
jeff
More information about the Binutils
mailing list