Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] Reflect commits: 1. 8d98f95 (https://cygwin.com/git/gitweb.cgi?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=commit;h=8d98f956cc398d086794e19051c3380d599022da) 2. 5c9403e (https://cygwin.com/git/gitweb.cgi?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=commit;h=5c9403eaf40951f8a4f55ed65f661b485ff44be7)

[Alexander Fedotov <alfedotov at gmail dot com>]

Yes, I just noticed that git send result isn't I've expected.
Will resend.

On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 20:13, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 7/31/19 11:38 AM, Alexander Fedotov wrote:
>
> Way too long for the subject line (which should ideally be less than 70
> characters, and should be a one-line summary of what is changing), and
> missing a commit message body (that's where you can go into the details,
> including why the change is worthwhile, rather than just pointing to a
> URL).
>
>
> > ---
> >  libgloss/arm/syscalls.c        | 12 ++++++------
> >  newlib/libc/sys/arm/crt0.S     |  7 +++++++
> >  newlib/libc/sys/arm/syscalls.c |  9 +++++++--
> >  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> I should know what the patch is intended to do by the time I get to this
> point in the email, but "Reflect commits" with two URLs as an
> overly-long subject has failed to do that. Can you please resubmit with
> a better commit message?
>
> --
> Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
> Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org
>
>