This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Cast "const char *" pointers to "char *" to avoid compiler warnings.


On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 17:02, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Oct 10 16:37, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 11:22, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Oct  2 11:10, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 00:50, Craig Howland <howland@lgsinnovations.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10/01/2018 05:33 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > GCC complains that some assignments loose the const-ness of several
> > > > > > data. This small patch adds explicit (char *) casts, but I'm not
> > > > > > familiar enough with what newlib does with these to be sure that they
> > > > > > are not modified. Maybe the proper fix would be to declare the
> > > > > > destinations as "const"?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Christophe
> > > > > If I understand what you're saying properly, it amounts to saying that you did
> > > > > not verify whether the GCC warnings about discarding const are valid or not, yet
> > > > > you are suppressing them.  Is this a proper understanding?  If so, it seems like
> > > > > these proposed patches are a bad idea, as they might be hiding a real problem,
> > > > > or changing the wrong thing.  (In a very quick look at locale.c, for example,
> > > > > locale can definitely be written to--it is definitely not const. This implies
> > > > > that the const on new_locale is what is wrong.)
> > > >
> > > > I did have this "very quick look at locale.c" before writing the
> > > > patch, and not adding
> > > > the cast at the assignment point means removing "const" from __loadlocale()
> > > > prototype:
> > > > char *__loadlocale (struct __locale_t *loc, int category, const char
> > > > *new_locale)
> > > > which in turn has a significant impact on the callers which I hope
> > > > people familiar
> > > > with this area can confirm, or not.
> > >
> > > The bug was, in fact, to define the third parameter as const, given it
> > > gets potentially overwritten.  None of the incoming values is const
> > > anyway.  I pushed a patch.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > However, when building for aarch64, I'm still seeing:
> > newlib/libc/ctype/ctype_.c:179:16: warning: assignment discards
> > ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
> >
> > And I think my patch (or something similar) is still needed for jp2uc.c ?
>
> I only had a look into the __loadlocal issue due to this discussion.
> For everything else, please send a new patch.
>

OK, here is the patch for jp2uc.c:

>
> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen
> Cygwin Maintainer
> Red Hat

Attachment: newlib-jp2uc.patch.txt
Description: Text document


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]