This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Oct 10 16:37, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 11:22, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Oct 2 11:10, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > > On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 00:50, Craig Howland <howland@lgsinnovations.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 10/01/2018 05:33 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > GCC complains that some assignments loose the const-ness of several > > > > > data. This small patch adds explicit (char *) casts, but I'm not > > > > > familiar enough with what newlib does with these to be sure that they > > > > > are not modified. Maybe the proper fix would be to declare the > > > > > destinations as "const"? > > > > > > > > > > Christophe > > > > If I understand what you're saying properly, it amounts to saying that you did > > > > not verify whether the GCC warnings about discarding const are valid or not, yet > > > > you are suppressing them. Is this a proper understanding? If so, it seems like > > > > these proposed patches are a bad idea, as they might be hiding a real problem, > > > > or changing the wrong thing. (In a very quick look at locale.c, for example, > > > > locale can definitely be written to--it is definitely not const. This implies > > > > that the const on new_locale is what is wrong.) > > > > > > I did have this "very quick look at locale.c" before writing the > > > patch, and not adding > > > the cast at the assignment point means removing "const" from __loadlocale() > > > prototype: > > > char *__loadlocale (struct __locale_t *loc, int category, const char > > > *new_locale) > > > which in turn has a significant impact on the callers which I hope > > > people familiar > > > with this area can confirm, or not. > > > > The bug was, in fact, to define the third parameter as const, given it > > gets potentially overwritten. None of the incoming values is const > > anyway. I pushed a patch. > > > > Thanks. > > However, when building for aarch64, I'm still seeing: > newlib/libc/ctype/ctype_.c:179:16: warning: assignment discards > ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers] > > And I think my patch (or something similar) is still needed for jp2uc.c ? I only had a look into the __loadlocal issue due to this discussion. For everything else, please send a new patch. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |