This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Improve performance of strstr

From: Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco dot Dijkstra at arm dot com>
To: Craig Howland <howland at LGSInnovations dot com>
Cc: nd <nd at arm dot com>, "newlib at sourceware dot org" <newlib at sourceware dot org>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 13:29:58 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve performance of strstr
References: <DB5PR08MB1030F4446DB776DF5E41B47383E80@DB5PR08MB1030.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>,<a149dd73-adb4-5206-aac6-18093b26545d@LGSInnovations.com>

Craig Howland wrote:

> It's not simply a comment, it is used in the generation of documentation (e.g. 
> make pdf), so, yes, definitely still useful and should/must be kept.  (The 
> FUNCTION, INDEX, SYNOPSYS, DESCRIPTION, RETURNS, etc., headings are used to 
> generate so-called chewout files (I have no idea why they are called that), 
> *.def, which in turn are used to make the various-format (e.g. PDF) man 
> pages/documents.)

Right I didn't realise that - I've added the comment back in the latest version.

Wilco

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Improve performance of strstr
  - From: Wilco Dijkstra
- Re: [PATCH] Improve performance of strstr
  - From: Craig Howland

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]