This is the mail archive of the
newlib@sourceware.org
mailing list for the newlib project.
Re: [PATCH v2] New expf, exp2f, logf, log2f and powf implementations
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
wrote:
> On Sep 29 11:41, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > On 05/09/17 09:38, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > Ok, I retract my reservations against OBSOLETE_MATH as such. However,
> > > there are a few problems with the current patch:
> > >
> > > - Rename to __OBSOLETE_MATH (two underscores) so as not to spoil the
> > > namespace.
> > >
> > > - The current implementation disallows a developer to override the
> > > setting from, e. g., sys/config.h or the command line. As a minimum,
> > > __OBSOLETE_MATH should only be set if it isn't already set, and the
> > > checks for __OBSOLETE_MATH should check for being != 0:
> > >
> > > - #define __TGT_OBSOLETE_MATH 1 in arm and aarch cases
> > >
> > > - At the end of the file
> > >
> > > #ifndef __OBSOLETE_MATH
> > > #define __OBSOLETE_MATH __TGT_OBSOLETE_MATH
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > - Further checks in the code:
> > >
> > > #if __OBSOLETE_MATH
> > >
> > > rather than
> > >
> > > #ifdef __OBSOLETE_MATH
> > >
> > > - The header of ieeefp.h explains the options. Add
> __TGT_OBSOLETE_MATH /
> > > __OBSOLETE_MATH and add an informative comment along the lines of the
> > > above text, so developers have enough info to decide if they want to
> > > enable this for their target.
> > >
> > > Not sure if __TGT_OBSOLETE_MATH is a good name, though. I'm open for
> > > better suggestions.
> > >
> >
> > i used __OBSOLETE_MATH_DEFAULT.
> >
> > v2:
> > - Use __OBSOLETE_MATH and __OBSOLETE_MATH_DEFAULT.
> > - Upstream change: whitespace code style fixes.
> > - Upstream change: HIDDEN attribute for data symbols.
> > - Upstream change: __logf_data.poly array size is reduced.
> > - Upstream change: issignalingf_inline now has code for non-standard
> SNaN.
>
> The above points have been fixed, so I'm ok with the change if
> it makes sense from an FP point of view. Jeff?
>
I am fine with it. Please go ahead.
>
> Thanks,
> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen
> Cygwin Maintainer
> Red Hat
>
- References:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] New expf, exp2f, logf, log2f and powf implementations
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] New expf, exp2f, logf, log2f and powf implementations
- [PATCH v2] New expf, exp2f, logf, log2f and powf implementations
- Re: [PATCH v2] New expf, exp2f, logf, log2f and powf implementations