Re: h8300, m32c and PRIuPTR

[Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>]

On Tue, 17 Mar 2015, Joel Sherrill wrote:

> On 3/17/2015 11:09 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Mar 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> >> Do we really gain anything by introducing a massive ifdef mentioning
> >> all targets out there?  This looks like overkill.
> > Was there some problem with the logic I suggested in 
> > <https://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2014/msg00421.html> to determine the 
> > type used for intptr_t without any per-architecture conditionals or 
> > configure tests being needed?  (It's true that if some architecture 
> > decides to use e.g. __int24 for intptr_t, additional cases would be 
> > needed, but that logic should cover all architectures where int, long or 
> > long long are used.)
> That works except in cases where the definition of uintptr_t varies based
> on the multilib. 

My proposed logic would go in an architecture-independent installed 
header, so I don't see the issue.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com