This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
W dniu 2013-06-04 20:05, Carl Norum pisze:
Yes, but at least it upstreams the interface. Hopefully that would be useful for people working on this kind of problem in the future. Something like how the calls to __malloc_lock and __malloc_free (or even any of the system calls like _write_r, _isatty_r, etc.) are handled in newlib currently.
But do note, that empty __malloc_lock() and __malloc_unlock() are provided, so that everything works as expected if you don't need them. In case of stdio it can't be done that easily, because - as you noted - there's this LOCK_INIT() macro for static locks... And your patch just provides another set of names for the ones already used, without providing any implementation...
4\/3!!
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |