This is the mail archive of the
newlib@sourceware.org
mailing list for the newlib project.
RE: [PATCH newlib]An alternative implementation of malloc family's functions with small foot-print
- From: "Bin Cheng" <bin dot cheng at arm dot com>
- To: <newlib at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 10:00:10 +0800
- Subject: RE: [PATCH newlib]An alternative implementation of malloc family's functions with small foot-print
- References: <004501ce4fad$4301c8d0$c9055a70$ at cheng@arm.com> <20130528104459 dot GF5264 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <006001ce5c35$1f0cfcd0$5d26f670$ at cheng@arm.com> <20130529090657 dot GA17692 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <006401ce5c4c$0b8ddf00$22a99d00$ at cheng@arm.com> <20130529124029 dot GA29882 at calimero dot vinschen dot de>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: newlib-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:newlib-owner@sourceware.org] On
> Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 8:40 PM
> To: newlib@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH newlib]An alternative implementation of malloc family's
> functions with small foot-print
>
> On May 29 17:08, Bin Cheng wrote:
> > > Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
> > > On May 29 14:24, Bin Cheng wrote:
> > > > The new patch is attached, is it OK?
> > >
> > > Yes, thank you. Please apply.
> > >
> >
> > Could you please apply it for me cause I don't have write access.
>
> Done. Would you mind to look into the lock/unlock issue as well at one point?
Yes, I will follow up that.
Thanks.