This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 02/20/2013 10:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Guarantee? No. We can only make an educated guess. Just for testing > I tried it on i686-pc-cygwin and i686-w64-mingw32 and both return > > #define __SIZE_TYPE__ unsigned int > > If the educated guess doesn't work, a machine dependent override will > be necessary. > > And I agree with Ralf. In the long run, GCC should really define > __SSIZE_TYPE__ and friends... If only gcc had given us __SSIZE_TYPE__ to begin with. We could generate __SIZE_TYPE__ from __SSIZE_TYPE__ (slap on an unsigned); but once the unsigned is there, there is no way in C preprocessor to pull it back out. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |