This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: [PATCH libgloss/arm] discourge the use of blx when it's not supported

From: "Bin Cheng" <bin dot cheng at arm dot com>
To: "'Nick Clifton'" <nickc at redhat dot com>
Cc: <newlib at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 19:27:16 +0800
Subject: RE: [PATCH libgloss/arm] discourge the use of blx when it's not supported
References: <4e804f68.a3b6ec0a.59c5.ffffeea6SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <CANnWgkBezUOOdbzfKSo6h2CWEKnj+O5PYW0-6VAS1kZd6rkUXw@mail.gmail.com> <4E845265.1000503@redhat.com>

> Hi Bin, Hi Carl,
> 
>    Sorry for the delay in reviewing this patch - I was on vacation.
> 
>    Anyway I have looked over the patch, and it is fine.  I have checked
> it in, along with a slightly expanded changelog entry:
> 
> Cheers
>    Nick
> 
> libgloss/ChangeLog
> 2011-09-29  Bin Cheng  <bin.cheng@arm.com>
> 
> 	* arm/arm.h (HAVE_CALL_INDIRECT): Define.
>          * arm/crt0.S (indirect_call): New macro.  Encodes indirect
> 	function calls.  Does not use blx for pre-armv5 targets.

Thanks very much, Nick.

References:
- Re: [PATCH libgloss/arm] discourge the use of blx when it's not supported
  - From: Can Finner
- Re: [PATCH libgloss/arm] discourge the use of blx when it's not supported
  - From: Nick Clifton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]