This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
If you didn't specify an option like -i on the build, then check which make you are using and if there are any updates available. You can set up a small test case to reproduce the problem and if still present you should open a bug.
I'm using gmake 3.81. I didn't specify -i. According to the man page of gmake return code 1 should only happen if I specify -q, which I didn't. I will check with gmake 3.80 to see if it happens there too.
It is likely that I gummed this up when I brought the code in originally and modified it to work for newlib. Obviously, this new code has never been compiled on the z8k. I've made up a proposed patch to fix this. Try it out and let me know.
It works. But in order for the compile to succeed, I had to do another change (appended). It is also a variable declaration in the middle of a function. I think there is no parameter to tell current gcc to report an error for such things, even with -std=c89 :-( This is very annoying...
regards, chris
Index: ldtoa.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/newlib/libc/stdlib/ldtoa.c,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.11 ldtoa.c
--- ldtoa.c 16 May 2007 19:59:40 -0000 1.11
+++ ldtoa.c 6 Jun 2007 18:15:18 -0000
@@ -2868,9 +2868,6 @@
LDPARMS rnd;
LDPARMS *ldp = &rnd;
-rnd.rlast = -1;
-rnd.rndprc = NBITS;
-
union uconv du;
du.d = *d;
#if LDBL_MANT_DIG == 24
@@ -2883,6 +2880,9 @@
e113toe( &du.pe, e, ldp );
#endif
+rnd.rlast = -1;
+rnd.rndprc = NBITS;
+
if( (e[NE-1] & 0x7fff) == 0x7fff )
{
#ifdef NANS
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |