This is the mail archive of the libffi-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the libffi project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: OSX 10.6 libffi updates

From: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>
To: Jay K <jay dot krell at cornell dot edu>
Cc: <twall at users dot sf dot net>, <libffi-discuss at sourceware dot org>
Cc: Abdulaziz Ghuloum <aghuloum at gmail dot com>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 14:40:54 -0400
Subject: Re: OSX 10.6 libffi updates
References: <8176B6CD-5517-457E-A606-B1C2F2250693@users.sf.net> <m3d3wdtheu.fsf@redhat.com> <COL101-W53AB448D8799B138D969A6E6ED0@phx.gbl>

Jay K <jay.krell@cornell.edu> writes:

> I don't know the formula, just that it isn't what anyone would expect.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_%28operating_system%29
> says 10.5 == 9.0, 10.6==10.0, among others.

Thanks Jay.   So x86 darwin10.0 is known to build thanks for aghuloum (although I see no
test results).   I guess nobody tried the ppc version.   

Is it still a platform people care about?  I thought Apple was all Intel these days.

AG

Follow-Ups:
- RE: OSX 10.6 libffi updates
  - From: Jay K

References:
- OSX 10.6 libffi updates
  - From: Timothy Wall
- Re: OSX 10.6 libffi updates
  - From: Anthony Green
- RE: OSX 10.6 libffi updates
  - From: Jay K

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]