This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> writes: > Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >> Yes, we need more releases. > > I disagree. We don't need releases. Just anchor points which help > pin-pointing problems easier. > > >> I would still do some prominent official releases. > > Why? You just say what you want but not why. I simply don't see any > reason to do something extraordinary. The minor version will be bump > when it is the time. This won't be different from any other bump. I want to have some major release that we put on ftp.gnu.org as tarball and announce properly. I'm under the impression that the bi-weekly "anchor-points" are not put up anywhere. > Everybody who is distribution glibc should _always_ use the top of the tree. There're outside some people that do not use cvs, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |