This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: versioning

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
Cc: Glibc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 09:58:06 -0800
Subject: Re: versioning
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
References: <3FC845DE.1030905@redhat.com> <u8ad6f9wza.fsf@gromit.moeb>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andreas Jaeger wrote:

> Yes, we need more releases.

I disagree.  We don't need releases.  Just anchor points which help
pin-pointing problems easier.

> I would still do some prominent official releases.

Why?  You just say what you want but not why.  I simply don't see any
reason to do something extraordinary.  The minor version will be bump
when it is the time.  This won't be different from any other bump.
Everybody who is distribution glibc should _always_ use the top of the tree.

- -- 
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/yN4u2ijCOnn/RHQRAmj/AJ4+yFULQ2lJi+R9DZdZW+lirzRzcACfT6Yt
m0rUxsjorLNKVeL+0GOkjsA=
=pGj/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: versioning
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

References:
- versioning
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: versioning
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]