This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:38:10PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote: > I see what you mean. It's a bit icky to depend on the other > header-files including the pre-requisites of lowlevellock.h, but yes, > it makes the problem _much_ simpler to handle, so thanks for the tip. When using the syscalls in macros only and not inlines, it doesn't depend on the order of pre-requisities of lowlevellock.h, just on sysdep.h being included in all the files which use lll_futex_ macros (only a handful of sources in NPTL sysdeps/ which all include sysdep.h). Jakub
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |