This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: new syscall stub support for ia64 libc

From: David Mosberger <davidm at napali dot hpl dot hp dot com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Cc: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>,libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:47:37 -0800
Subject: Re: new syscall stub support for ia64 libc
References: <200310290426.h9T4Q9pw014305@napali.hpl.hp.com><20031029074436.GR12344@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz><16288.50694.36460.339805@napali.hpl.hp.com><20031031084249.GA30446@twiddle.net><20031031070114.GV12344@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz><16290.37282.439025.287911@napali.hpl.hp.com><20031031144724.GY12344@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz><16306.47596.371542.356256@napali.hpl.hp.com><3FB2BC2B.8020602@redhat.com>
Reply-to: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com

>>>>> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:03:07 -0800, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> said:

  Uli> David Mosberger wrote:

  >> - The inline-syscall macros are now in a separate file,

  Uli> I don't like this one bit.  This makes ia64 sources different from the
  Uli> rest which is not necessary.

So what do you suggest?  I don't think lowlevellock.h can include sysdep.h:

 - sysdep.h includes tls.h
 - tls.h includes descr.h
 - descr.h includes lowlevellock.h

	--david

Follow-Ups:
- Re: new syscall stub support for ia64 libc
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- Re: new syscall stub support for ia64 libc
  - From: David Mosberger
- Re: new syscall stub support for ia64 libc
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]