This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [glibc] hurd: Fix ld.so link
Hello,
Somehow I didn't receive these mails, I don't know why.
Florian Weimer, le mar. 17 déc. 2019 19:02:23 +0100, a ecrit:
> * Joseph Myers:
> > On Fri, 13 Dec 2019, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> >> * Samuel Thibault:
> >>
> >> > https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=d5ed9ba29a3c818b3433a1784862494968abda45
> >> >
> >> > commit d5ed9ba29a3c818b3433a1784862494968abda45
> >> > Author: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
> >> > Date: Sun Dec 1 14:58:25 2019 +0000
> >> >
> >> > hurd: Fix ld.so link
> >> >
> >> > Since a2e8aa0d9ea6 ("Block signals during the initial part of dlopen") dl_open
> >> > uses sigprocmask, so we need a stub implementation.
> >>
> >> Should we revert this change (and 892badc9bbcd4a6f8), now that dlopen no
> >> longer calls sigprocmask?
> >
> > Note that right now there is a regression shown by build-many-glibcs.py
> > for i686-gnu:
> >
> > Missing required PLT reference: ld.so: __sigprocmask
> >
> > https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-testresults/2019-q4/msg00344.html
>
> Yes, that's part of the motivation for my query?
>
> Should I just push the two reverts?
Please feel free to.
Thanks!
Samuel