This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [glibc] hurd: Fix ld.so link

* Joseph Myers:

> On Fri, 13 Dec 2019, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> * Samuel Thibault:
>> 
>> > https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=d5ed9ba29a3c818b3433a1784862494968abda45
>> >
>> > commit d5ed9ba29a3c818b3433a1784862494968abda45
>> > Author: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
>> > Date:   Sun Dec 1 14:58:25 2019 +0000
>> >
>> >     hurd: Fix ld.so link
>> >     
>> >     Since a2e8aa0d9ea6 ("Block signals during the initial part of dlopen") dl_open
>> >     uses sigprocmask, so we need a stub implementation.
>> 
>> Should we revert this change (and 892badc9bbcd4a6f8), now that dlopen no
>> longer calls sigprocmask?
>
> Note that right now there is a regression shown by build-many-glibcs.py 
> for i686-gnu:
>
> Missing required PLT reference: ld.so: __sigprocmask
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-testresults/2019-q4/msg00344.html

Yes, that's part of the motivation for my query?

Should I just push the two reverts?

Thanks,
Florian
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]