This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH 1/3] nptl: Move nanosleep implementation to libc
* Adhemerval Zanella:
> On 06/11/2019 11:13, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Adhemerval Zanella:
>>
>>> I will check for all affected ABI, but I think there is no need. In fact
>>> I am not sure if Joseph rationale at b289cd9db8286fa6c670104dd5dfcfc68d5d00d6
>>> is currently true, we now need at least one absolute ABI symbol in at least
>>> one library.
>>
>> Hah, I thought I had broken the ABI test.
>>
>> I don't think the symbol matters, so that part is actually true, but we
>> do need to check the presence of the .gnu.version_d entry in a test
>> because that's what the loader expects (and as discussed, we do not want
>> to change that, at least not for lazy binding).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Florian
>>
>
> Right, I checked the libpthread.so .gnu.version_d entries for every ABI
> affected and all of them contains the required versions (including for
> architectures which exports __nanosleep with a different version).
Good to know, thanks.
Florian