This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH 1/3] nptl: Move nanosleep implementation to libc
On 06/11/2019 11:13, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Adhemerval Zanella:
>
>> I will check for all affected ABI, but I think there is no need. In fact
>> I am not sure if Joseph rationale at b289cd9db8286fa6c670104dd5dfcfc68d5d00d6
>> is currently true, we now need at least one absolute ABI symbol in at least
>> one library.
>
> Hah, I thought I had broken the ABI test.
>
> I don't think the symbol matters, so that part is actually true, but we
> do need to check the presence of the .gnu.version_d entry in a test
> because that's what the loader expects (and as discussed, we do not want
> to change that, at least not for lazy binding).
>
> Thanks,
> Florian
>
Right, I checked the libpthread.so .gnu.version_d entries for every ABI
affected and all of them contains the required versions (including for
architectures which exports __nanosleep with a different version).