This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] posix: Use posix_spawn for wordexp
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
- To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>, Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 21:33:25 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] posix: Use posix_spawn for wordexp
- References: <20190731183136.21545-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <20190731183136.21545-5-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
* Adhemerval Zanella:
> diff --git a/posix/wordexp-test.c b/posix/wordexp-test.c
> index 10a0768a6b..ef780b0a65 100644
> --- a/posix/wordexp-test.c
> +++ b/posix/wordexp-test.c
> -/* For each fork increment the fork count. */
> -static void
> -register_fork (void)
> -{
> - registered_forks++;
> -}
It's a bit sad to see this testing go away. It was originally added to
catch command execution with WRDE_NOCMD.
On Linux, could you enter a PID namespace instead and check that the
next PID has the expected value?
Carlos, you added this testing. Do you have an opinion here?
> diff --git a/posix/wordexp.c b/posix/wordexp.c
> index 22c6d18a9c..e1aafcaceb 100644
> --- a/posix/wordexp.c
> +++ b/posix/wordexp.c
> +static char **
> +create_environment (void)
> +{
> + size_t s = 0;
> +
> + /* Calculate total environment size, including 'IFS' if is present. */
> + for (char **ep = __environ; *ep != NULL; ep++, s++);
I would put s++ into the body of the for loop, for clarity. Or give ep
a wider scope and use s = ep -- __environ.
> + /* Include final NULL pointer. */
> + char **newenviron = malloc (s * sizeof (char*));
> + if (newenviron == NULL)
> + return NULL;
char* should be char *. I don't see how this includes the final NULL?
Should we do all this work only if IFS= is actually present? That is,
skip all this for getenv ("IFS) == NULL?
> + /* Copy current environment excluding 'IFS', to make sure the subshell
> + doesn't field-split on our behalf. */
That comment should apply to the entire function, I think.
> @@ -884,13 +898,13 @@ exec_comm (char *comm, char **word, size_t *word_length, size_t *max_length,
> size_t maxnewlines = 0;
> char buffer[bufsize];
> pid_t pid;
> - int noexec = 0;
> + bool noexec = false;
>
> /* Do nothing if command substitution should not succeed. */
> if (flags & WRDE_NOCMD)
> return WRDE_CMDSUB;
>
> - /* Don't fork() unless necessary */
> + /* Don't posix_spawn() unless necessary */
GNU style doesn't use () after function names.
Thanks,
Florian