This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Don't pass NULL pointer to error [BZ #24556]

From: Stefan Liebler <stli at linux dot ibm dot com>
To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:10:35 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't pass NULL pointer to error [BZ #24556]
References: <20190522224053.15351-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> <877eah1wmk.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <CAMe9rOo6NB16mBMVFKL63Y0s1U6+d=ThezVj1BCggAwutBAnRA@mail.gmail.com> <87tvdlw62m.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <CAMe9rOqF-VzB9y+K2zvX7up=zmowpb4sewfudo2UhqxLP-oURA@mail.gmail.com> <87mujdw54b.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <ff5c5b6e-18a3-ff18-ffc4-31e0ae8aa2de@gmail.com> <72f51389-2273-cce4-3997-5c825bf12c33@cs.ucla.edu> <CAMe9rOogEhm1OFDB9jPOK7cZ1CNTLkGHcBYFz01xfhY_0gUG7A@mail.gmail.com>

On 6/17/19 9:32 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:35 PM Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:


On 5/23/19 9:21 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:

I'd rather discourage
relying on the Glibc printf extension than remove the transformations
or suppress the warning.


I agree that this is a good way to go, as we can't keep fighting
compilers forever. I wrote a patch implementing this suggestion and
filed a bug report proposing it here:

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24616


GCC 9 can't build bench today.  What should we do?

Sorry. I've just recognized this thread.
I've already posted a patch which also fixes "make bench" with gcc 9:
"[PATCH] Fix gcc 9 build errors for make xcheck."
https://www.sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-06/msg00374.html

Bye
Stefan

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Don't pass NULL pointer to error [BZ #24556]
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]