This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] Don't pass NULL pointer to error [BZ #24556]
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Paul Eggert <eggert at cs dot ucla dot edu>
- Cc: Martin Sebor <msebor at gmail dot com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, msebor at redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 12:32:33 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't pass NULL pointer to error [BZ #24556]
- References: <20190522224053.15351-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> <877eah1wmk.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <CAMe9rOo6NB16mBMVFKL63Y0s1U6+d=ThezVj1BCggAwutBAnRA@mail.gmail.com> <87tvdlw62m.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <CAMe9rOqF-VzB9y+K2zvX7up=zmowpb4sewfudo2UhqxLP-oURA@mail.gmail.com> <87mujdw54b.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <ff5c5b6e-18a3-ff18-ffc4-31e0ae8aa2de@gmail.com> <72f51389-2273-cce4-3997-5c825bf12c33@cs.ucla.edu>
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:35 PM Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
>
> On 5/23/19 9:21 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > I'd rather discourage
> > relying on the Glibc printf extension than remove the transformations
> > or suppress the warning.
>
> I agree that this is a good way to go, as we can't keep fighting
> compilers forever. I wrote a patch implementing this suggestion and
> filed a bug report proposing it here:
>
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24616
>
GCC 9 can't build bench today. What should we do?
--
H.J.