This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] Add XFAIL_ROUNDING_IBM128_LIBGCC to more fma() tests
Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:
> [ text/plain ]
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2019, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
>
>> Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, 14 Jan 2019, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
>> >
>> >> Contrary to what I had thought: this is indeed caused by spurious
>> >> overflows from libgcc (confirmed with the patch applied to libgcc).
>> >> We can suppress the all errors with XFAIL_ROUNDING_IBM128_LIBGCC.
>> >
>> > In that case - if it's only an issue in non-default rounding modes - this
>> > patch is OK.
>>
>> They appear only when rounding upward and downward.
>>
>> Pushed as ecdacd34a2ac3b6d5a529ff218b29261d9d98a7a.
>
> Will you be closing bug 23584 (given the conclusion it's actually a libgcc
> issue, addressed via the XFAILing, not a glibc bug)?
Done.
Thanks! I was not aware of this bug report. ;-)
--
Tulio Magno