This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Add XFAIL_ROUNDING_IBM128_LIBGCC to more fma() tests

From: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom at linux dot ibm dot com>
To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, fweimer at redhat dot com, carlos at redhat dot com
Cc:
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 16:55:19 -0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add XFAIL_ROUNDING_IBM128_LIBGCC to more fma() tests
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1806132305161.17472@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20190114200936.21108-1-tuliom@linux.ibm.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1901142133121.18054@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:

> On Mon, 14 Jan 2019, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
>
>> Contrary to what I had thought: this is indeed caused by spurious
>> overflows from libgcc (confirmed with the patch applied to libgcc).
>> We can suppress the all errors with XFAIL_ROUNDING_IBM128_LIBGCC.
>
> In that case - if it's only an issue in non-default rounding modes - this 
> patch is OK.

They appear only when rounding upward and downward.

Pushed as ecdacd34a2ac3b6d5a529ff218b29261d9d98a7a.

Thanks!

-- 
Tulio Magno

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Add XFAIL_ROUNDING_IBM128_LIBGCC to more fma() tests
  - From: Joseph Myers

References:
- [PATCH] Add XFAIL_ROUNDING_IBM128_LIBGCC to more fma() tests
  - From: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
- Re: [PATCH] Add XFAIL_ROUNDING_IBM128_LIBGCC to more fma() tests
  - From: Joseph Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]