This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH v4] Improve the width of alternate representation for year in strftime [BZ #23758]
- From: TAMUKI Shoichi <tamuki at linet dot gr dot jp>
- To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 22:33:13 +0900
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Improve the width of alternate representation for year in strftime [BZ #23758]
- References: <de2b2db3-184b-e37c-af3c-704969803385@redhat.com>
Hello Carlos and all,
From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Improve the width of alternate representation for year in strftime [BZ #23758]
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 09:43:21 -0500
> Please split this patch into 2 patches as soon as possible.
I split the patch into 2 patches. [1][2][3]
[1] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-01/msg00239.html
[2] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-01/msg00240.html
[3] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-01/msg00241.html
> The fix for "%_EY"/"%-EY" should be reviewed separately as a bug fix,
> and can go into master even if we are in a frozen state (we are currently
> frozen for 2.29 release).
>
> I want to review these changes in parallel so we can get them into 2.29
> and be prepared for the Era name change.
So, we need to review these patches so that they can go into master.
Regards,
TAMUKI Shoichi