This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: What to do about gnulib libio dependencies?

From: Paul Eggert <eggert at cs dot ucla dot edu>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs dot nagy at arm dot com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Cc: nd at arm dot com
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 04:41:34 -0700
Subject: Re: What to do about gnulib libio dependencies?
References: <483a01e5-0d3d-1000-36d1-451f5f1051c3@redhat.com> <a2d6cf63-bb1f-fccf-4fc0-85af5caecf5c@arm.com> <bbe60d33-99af-ccfe-baa5-3b4dc5532595@redhat.com>

Carlos O'Donell wrote:

Why is gnulib expecting these internals
to be stable?

It's not. If glibc changes its internals in this area, gnulib will have toeither adapt or give up. I hope it won't be the latter; too many GNU programsuse that functionality.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What to do about gnulib libio dependencies?
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: What to do about gnulib libio dependencies?
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

References:
- What to do about gnulib libio dependencies?
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: What to do about gnulib libio dependencies?
  - From: Szabolcs Nagy
- Re: What to do about gnulib libio dependencies?
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]