This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 6/9] RISC-V: Split the soft-fp into rv32 and rv64


Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> 於 2018年7月13日 週五 下午6:34寫道:
>
> On 07/12/2018 08:00 PM, Zong Li wrote:
> > This is the problem I encountered, In  _FP_FMA (fs, wc, dwc, R, X, Y, Z),
> > it will use the _FP_FRAC_HIGHBIT_DW_##dwc macro, and it will be expanded to
> >  _FP_FRAC_HIGHBIT_DW_8, but the _FP_FRAC_HIGHBIT_DW_8 is not be
> > implemented in soft-fp/op-8.h, there is only _FP_FRAC_HIGHBIT_DW_1,
> > _FP_FRAC_HIGHBIT_DW_2 and _FP_FRAC_HIGHBIT_DW_4 in the soft-fp/op-*.h.
> >
> > I cannot find another 32 bit port has this issue, because they use the ldbl-128.
>
> It appears that the code has bitrotted somewhat because of non-use.
>
> Also, _FP_FRAC_HIGHBIT_DW_[1234] is a macro that should not exist,
> because it has an identical definition in each case.  But in the
> meantime, just copy any of the other (identical) definitions into
> op-8.h.
>
> The other levels of macro nesting to which this expands does exist.
> At least as far as I can track it by eye.  ;-)
>
>
> r~

Thanks for your reply. So shall I need to submit a patch for adding
these definition of
macros first?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]