This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 11/12] ldbl-128ibm-compat: Redirect complex math functions


Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:

> I don't see any test infrastructure in this patch series for either the 
> math.h or complex.h functions.  Is that to be added separately?

Yes.  I was planning to send it with the last patch set as it depends on
other changes to sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/le/Makefile.

> Principles include:
>
> * As ulps are currently identified as "ldouble" and "float128", those need 
> to be appropriately associated with the correct formats in testing (which 
> the testing already handles for getting _FloatN tests using the 
> appropriate ulps, whatever type name those ulps may be listed with).

OK.

> * The libm functions built for each format should be tested.  While most 
> of the functions built for float128 are at least tested under their *f128 
> names, you have those such as __significandieee128 which don't have such a 
> name and so need testing added for the code to get tested at all.
>
> * There should be at least some test coverage that the redirection works, 
> i.e. tests built and run with binary128 long double.

The proposal is to build all ldouble tests twice: one for -mabi=ieeelongdouble
and another for -mabi=ibmlongdouble.
So, I think both of these concerns are covered.

-- 
Tulio Magno


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]