This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 05/22/2018 05:06 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Mai 22 2018, Florian Weimer<fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:And with the original reproducer, we wouldn't hit preloop_large, where the bug is.Worksforme. $ string/test-mempcpy
I don't doubt that. Our CPUs probably have different cache sizes, or there are differences in how different glibc versions compute the effective cache size.
Thanks, Florian
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |