This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 05/22/2018 03:21 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Mai 22 2018, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:It has to do with copy sizes and relation to the cache size. I had to adjust your reproducer to make it fail on KNL, basically increasing the copy size by a factor of 10.What is the architectural maximum cache size?
My test machine had an L2 cache size of 1 MiB. I think the cut-over happens at half of that (at least for our backported version), which is why
#define N 976999 in your reproducer word for me (along with -O0 -fno-builtin). Thanks, Florian
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |