This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: manual: Complete @standards in lang.texi.
On 06/19/2017 07:53 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Rical Jasan wrote:
>> So my question is, does, "OK, but.." mean, "commit and don't forget to
>> ... later", or, "looks good but also needs ... first"? I can cut the
>> conversion out easily enough and still complete the annotations.
> In this case, "commit and don't forget to ... later" together with "while
> there isn't such a list, you need to be extra careful about being
> consistent about naming of standards in annotations you add or refine, and
> about what if anything should be listed in @standards in the way of
> information about a function's history beyond which standards supported by
> the glibc headers it's in".
Duly noted, and committed (b8216e82).