This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: manual: Complete @standards in lang.texi.
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Rical Jasan wrote:
> So my question is, does, "OK, but.." mean, "commit and don't forget to
> ... later", or, "looks good but also needs ... first"? I can cut the
> conversion out easily enough and still complete the annotations.
In this case, "commit and don't forget to ... later" together with "while
there isn't such a list, you need to be extra careful about being
consistent about naming of standards in annotations you add or refine, and
about what if anything should be listed in @standards in the way of
information about a function's history beyond which standards supported by
the glibc headers it's in".
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com