This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 11/09/2016 03:50 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Nov 09 2016, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:Does this mean that if the application links against -ldl and invokes dlopen, a different dynamic linker implementation is used???? There is only one dynamic linker, which is ld.so.
If this is really true, then I don't understand why we need the indirection in _dl_open_hook.
Is there a way to get rid of those function pointers, or move _dl_open_hook into a RELRO section?
Thanks, Florian
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |