This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility reasons.
- From: Yury Norov <ynorov at caviumnetworks dot com>
- To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs dot nagy at arm dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, LKML <linux-kernel at vger dot kernel dot org>, nd <nd at arm dot com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb dot de>, Catalin Marinas <catalin dot marinas at arm dot com>, Marcus Shawcroft <marcus dot shawcroft at arm dot com>, <philb at gnu dot org>, David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>, Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim dot kuvyrkov at linaro dot org>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Andrew Pinski <apinski at cavium dot com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 09:13:29 +0300
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility reasons.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp dot mailfrom=Yuri dot Norov at caviumnetworks dot com;
- References: <1466485631-3532-1-git-send-email-ynorov at caviumnetworks dot com> <1466485631-3532-2-git-send-email-ynorov at caviumnetworks dot com> <5769139E dot 7020805 at arm dot com> <20160623043542 dot GA13449 at yury-N73SV> <CA+=Sn1nsODgGaRT8VLLqfVg+kp7=rr2i0XDT5j0NM_HJhMtv1Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <mvma8icnyw1 dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <CA+=Sn1nLp2_5mNTmG1=bKibGnkUWgBoOGf0DVxGRM2MkK3jQ4w at mail dot gmail dot com> <mvm1t3onxru dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <13f337ec-9ab8-9d7f-8984-0992ef73ddc7 at redhat dot com> <CA+=Sn1=i2WcOfmhwUc3Qpeyy4LHO6pu-6BYsH_c3WWcr-4twXA at mail dot gmail dot com>
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 04:26:01PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 4:38 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 06/23/2016 09:56 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >>
> >> Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >>> So the question becomes do we care enough about the incompatibles
> >>> between AARCH32 and AARCH64 to fix this and go just worry about ILP32
> >>> and LP64?
> >>
> >>
> >> Some armv8 chips do not implement all of armv7, so how relevant is
> >> aarch32 on aarch64?
> >
> >
> > I also do not see sufficient justification for this ABI break.
>
> Yury,
> Can you patch ILP32 glibc to use 64bit integer for utmp struct?
Yes I can. I will send v2 next week with that patch.
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Florian
> >