This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Update minimum make version to 3.81


On 24 Jun 2016 18:31, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 06/24/2016 06:10 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 24 Jun 2016 13:24, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> On 06/11/2016 12:27 AM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> >>> eval is a pretty horrible feature and I'd probably object to introducing
> >>> any uses of it into libc's makefiles.  We already have lots of things that
> >>> might have been done that way, but are instead done with generated makefiles.
> >>
> >> I would like to put this into malloc/Makefile:
> >>
> >> $(foreach t,$(tests),$(eval CFLAGS-$t.c += -DTEST_NO_MALLOPT))
> >>
> >> What's the alternative for adding a -D flag to every test compilation in
> >> a subdirectory?
> >
> > maybe something like (untested):
> > CPPFLAGS += $(if $(filter $(@F),$(tests)),-DTEST_NO_MALLOPT)
> 
> Hmm, right.  It's relying on the delayed expansion.  Not sure how this 
> is less evil, though.  It also has at least quadratic run-time behavior.

what about using target-specific variables and relying on inheritance [1] ?
does this work ?
$(tests): CPPFLAGS += ...

[1] https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Target_002dspecific.html
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]