This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH x86-64][BZ #20024] Fixed vector sincos/sincosf ABI
- From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Andrew Senkevich <andrew dot n dot senkevich at gmail dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 20:02:24 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH x86-64][BZ #20024] Fixed vector sincos/sincosf ABI
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAMXFM3tO0RGFjbrQaEV80rTCWmUy8LQjkZ7gRd9j+Q3YQ2+nAQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 20 dot 1606022247540 dot 9542 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <CAMXFM3vREvMPjBU23ZGV6eyNs-exwHGG6C2WE6N1MHf=CqbkvA at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 20 dot 1606061404540 dot 15183 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
On 06/06/2016 10:08 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> C tests seem safer where possible. For example: the existing functions
> are said to take vectors of pointers. Does that mean vectors of 8-byte
> pointers for the 64-bit ABI and vectors of 4-byte pointers for x32? If
> so, a C test is more likely to get right that the ABI to test is different
> in those cases.
+1
--
Cheers,
Carlos.